Goal 5. Student, staff, faculty and administrative employees have satisfaction in their work in CNRS

Objective 5.1 Administrators, faculty, staff, and students contribute to a culture of mutual respect

Performance Indicator	Baseline	Action Item
Consistent evaluation processes are followed at all levels	Approximately 85% compliance with all processes.	Improve compliance to 100%
Shared governance includes representation from all stakeholders	The CNRS administrative handbook provides a structure for shared governance with the CNRS.	Review the CNRS administrative handbook annually and ensure the guidelines therein are implemented.
Number of grievances and similar reports of disrespectful behavior decrease	The CNRS has not gathered this information.	Design and implement a tracking system to measure grievances and related incidents.

Performance Indicator	Baseline	Action Item
RTP guidelines for academic departments are current	All departments have approved RTP guidelines.	Periodically review and calibrate RTP guidelines.
Workload is evaluated for consistency with classifications and position descriptions	Workload evaluation is carefully evaluated prior to the reappointment of new staff and faculty, but not always after several years into the appointment.	Conduct periodic workload evaluations for faculty and staff, to bring greater equity across the college and alignment with reasonable expectations.

Performance Indicator	Baseline	Action Item
Faculty and staff have opportunity to report their level of satisfaction (survey) and express issues and concerns	CNRS relies on ad hoc measures for expressing issues and concern through department chairs, union representatives, and the dean’s office.	Design and implement an annual employee satisfaction survey that allows for individual issues and concerns to be addressed.
An issues website is updated monthly for faculty and for staff	CNRS has not publicly communicated its efforts to resolve issues.	Do this.